I like that to be continuous with a fade between each track.I do this by creating a multitrack session then dragging all the music I want into a single track.
![adobe audition cc 2017 adobe audition cc 2017](https://i0.wp.com/thehouseofportable.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/adobe-audition-cc-2018-portable.png)
Most of my sound work is for theatre and I always have to produce a mood CD for people walking into the auditorium. If what you want is an automatic crossfade (rather than just continuous sound with no breaks) I don't recall 2015 doing that automatically either. So, which do you want, a "join" or an "overlap"? To me, they are NOT synonymous.Īnd, for you to take apparent offence in your latest post at what has been written as correct advice is inappropriate, to say the least. But I note you speak of "overlapping", which suggests, as Bob mentioned, that you want the next track to begin before the previous one has finished, hence a "crossfade". That produces a cut/splice/join, call it what you will (I've just done this with a CD, admittedly in CS6, but the process is the same) with no gap, assuming you have correctly designated the beginning and end of each track (no silence in the file, either at the beginning or end). The advice you have been given by SteveG about reducing the gap to zero is the way to do this if you want each track to play immediately after the preceding one has finished. Not sure about any other reader, but I see no pictures, sorry. I went and changed my settings and yes there is no space now but it's not spliced overlapping eachother for a smooth transfer.
![adobe audition cc 2017 adobe audition cc 2017](https://i1.wp.com/a2zp30.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Adobe-Audition-CC-2017-10.0.0-FULL-Crack-Mac-OS-X.png)
In the 2105 version it allowed me to burn the spliced song togwther.
Adobe audition cc 2017 update#
The 2nd picture is all the songs that the new update is making me individualize. The first picture is of my spliced songs mixed together for cheer.